this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
597 points (88.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

4524 readers
873 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

As a Leftist there are a few types of leftists I hate

  • Fake Leftists: People who think Socialism is when "government does stuff" and they just want the government to do everything
  • Ignorant Leftists: People who blindly hate capitalism but make no real attempt to look into leftist theory
  • "Anti-imperalists": People who support "anti-imperialism" by supporting the other empire. These people will blindly support Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, the Taliban, Assad's Syria, HTS, and occasionally blatant terrorism.
  • Aesthetic "Leftists": People who see leftism as nothing more than an aesthetic which they can use. They make no real attempt to understand leftism but rather then simply being ignorent they actively attempt to subvert the term. These people will say "leftism just means left of center" and use that to justify Capitalism, western imperialism, and other very non leftist ideals under the justification that "leftism has no hard definition" (it does).
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Aesthetic “Leftists”

Absolutely infuriating. These are people who spend a lot of time on discord, closely nurturing a group of diverse people of specific ethnic or gender/sexual identities because it makes them feel very progressive but makes no effort to see their "friends" as humans and won't hold them accountable when any of them become abusive or hassle other friends in the group. These are the college-kids who will commit all their energy to fighting a school-mascot which bothers nobody, while literal nazis march on another part of the campus. These are the ones who create campaigns to "take down" another popular leftist for saying something like the word "retarded" while actual threats to humanity rise in power. And generally just find it a lot easier to attack people ostensibly on their side than the actual challenge of fighting for actual community organization efforts against a rising tide of fascism and hate.

For these kids being progressive or leftist is entirely about preserving an in-club of specific people who can hate outsiders, but they feel they have a broader societal blessing for the exclusionary and wildly performative attitudes.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

for saying something like the word "retarded" while actual threats to humanity rise in power

That one is such a sad phenomenon. I recently saw it in a community I'm in: "Crazy". If the word was once derogatory towards a group of people, I'd say it has long since lost its teeth, while the stigma it used to express continues to exist independently of individual words. Words have power, but fighting words is useless if the power goes unchecked and self-destructive if other, worse powers grow while you're distracted.

That's not to say you shouldn't be mindful with your language, but maybe focus on the bigger issue first. I'm personally not a fan of people casually calling things autistic that aren't, because I'm autistic and my need for clear, unambiguous language compels me to have certain specific terms keep their specific meaning. If you misuse it, I might bring it up (as a personal opinion type thing, I'm just as prone to error or misunderstandings as anyone else), but I wouldn't attempt to "take you down" or anything over it while we're both fighting people that do worse than just misuse language.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

fighting words is useless if the power goes unchecked

I'm going to steal this.

In the meantime, I make deliberate efforts to NOT censor or filter my language if I'm not clearly attacking someone and someone takes issue with my use of... sigh... "crazy" then I know right away that person is NOT an alley to a greater cause, so if anything it does tend to save me some time. I rather let the sheltered kids argue it out with each other if the term "mad" is a problem or if doors should have five doorknobs at different levels to serve people of different heights. (I just made this one up on the spot, but fully expect to see it as the next major culture war flashpoint.)

The right has an advantage in that they don't even think in language as much. This all exists on a spectrum of course, and strengths can become weaknesses in other areas, but it's very hard to teach people that kind of nuance. But the lack of language-based thinking leads to more cohesive in-groups who don't pick apart each other's beliefs. They're able to connect with each other far easier as emotional monkeys, but this also leads to the reinforcement of primitive emotions like fear of strangers and people who look or talk different.

As someone recently diagnosed as autistic also, I have become fond of giving people "the pass" if they take issue with my ableist language. It's good for a laugh.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

the worst by any margin are the leftist gatekeepers ! I hate those guys, they're not real leftists

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Damn leftists, they ruined leftism

Jokes apart, language is an important tool to express thoughs and persuade people what is better or worse. And when so many concepts get conflated in a single word "leftist"/"leftism" /"socialism"/"communism" , it diminishes the focus of conversations around it. It confuses and distracts from the ideas worth discussing.

this is a way to confuse, divide and defeat the healthy expression of ideas, debate, and by consequence, the capability of people to organize around the ideas that resonate with then.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

supporting the other empire [...] Cuba, Venezuela

Tell me you don't understand imperialism without telling me you don't understand imperialism (especially funny coming from someone criticising people who don't read theory). Cuba is possibly the most peaceful nation on Earth, with the core of its international policy usually being sending doctors to countries in need. Please tell me a single imperialist act by Cuba or Venezuela.

Critical support to flawed countries is a sad consequence of Realpolitik. Do you support England and the USSR joining forces against Nazism in World War 2? Because they're otherwise geopolitical enemies that only joined the effort because there was a greater evil.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cuba is possibly the most peaceful country on Earth

Yup, they're so incredibly peaceful that they have an entire Wikipedia article deticated to their foreign military interventions

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If [socialist country] is so [good characteristic], how come [wikipedia article predominantly edited by people from the west, citing sources from the west].

Also funny that even the article starts claiming that it's a list of "military and medical support", and most of the involvements you're seeing are support of emancipatory movements against imperialist aggression.