this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
671 points (97.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

485 readers
8 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

As per .world worldnews mod, no discussing naughty stuff like jury nullification.

While this post is blowing up, here's the book referenced by the shooter:

Delay Deny Defend - Why Insurance Companies Don't Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It

By request: Full, uncensored video of the shooting. (Fucking obviously NSFW)

Jury nullification: A practical FAQ

Do I have to answer questions about jury nullification?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If god is omnipotent, everything that happens is a result of his judgement.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Omnipotent, omnipresent, and benevolent, yes.

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Benevolent is very debatable gestures widely at genocide and children dying of cancer

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Indeed.

Note that I'm not claiming anything, just pointing out the traditional philosophical parameters of what-is-or-isn't-'god'.

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Even going by their own books calling god benevolent is a stretch

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which - oh that god. Yes. That one is particularly, um, violent.

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I’m referring to the abrahamic one…. I don’t know enough about Hinduism or other religions that have gods to have an opinion on them.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is impossible for a being to be omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent given the amount of suffering in the world. They can only be two of the three at most:

Omnipotent + omniscient = Knows about evil, can stop it, but chooses not to.

Omnipotent + benevolent = Can do something about evil and wants to stop it, is too oblivious to on a large scale.

Omniscient + benevolent = Knows about evil and wants to stop it, is powerless to do anything significant about it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the way most people see it.

As it happens, people don't generally talk about it very much. For some reason.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

If they're believers it's because god is "good" no matter what he does or allows to happen.