this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
416 points (99.1% liked)

196

16551 readers
1631 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
416
Antinatalism Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 months ago by BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
310 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The world as it is now, yes. But this is far from the only option, thus the world is not an inevitable soup of suffering. So, no.

[–] Katrisia@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unless you're both an antinatalist and a philosophical pessimist and believe that the world will always be that soup. But yeah, that's not the case for all antinatalists. A friend of mine calls himself a "temporary antinatalist".

[–] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

True. I guess the distinction, though semantically redundant, seems to be contextually necessary nowadays...