this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
130 points (97.1% liked)

Technik

330 readers
39 users here now

die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann

Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Are they also involved in more accidents, or is it a smaller proportion of accidents but they’re deadlier?

[–] cron 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The research into Tesla’s safety issues is ongoing and doesn’t paint a particularly coherent picture. Indeed, a similarly publicized report published in August by vehicle history information vendor EpicVIN claimed that, of all the car brands, Tesla drivers were least likely to suffer fatal injuries. If both that report and the iSeeCars report are to be believed, it would imply that Teslas drivers are most likely to be involved in fatal crashes but least likely to be killed in those crashes.

I have highlighted the relevant sentece, it is a little bit confusing.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not really. It's stating that Tesla accidents kill more people, just not the drivers of the Tesla.

Unrelated factoid: Tesla drivers are the highest demographic to self identify as not having survivor's guilt.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

These accident rates are normalized to billion miles driven. So long roadtrip highway miles vs city commute is going to be a major bias in these numbers. My take is that Tesla is fairly unique in that their models are heavily concentrated as a commuter car in dense urban areas, whereas other brands have more general use.