this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
302 points (99.7% liked)

World News

39151 readers
2168 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

An unsealed Brazilian Federal Police report alleges that former President Jair Bolsonaro actively planned and participated in a 2022 coup plot to remain in power after losing to Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

The report details Bolsonaro’s presentation of a draft decree to military commanders to suspend electoral court powers and investigate alleged voting fraud, though opposition from army and air force leaders stopped the plan.

Bolsonaro denies involvement, but faces accusations of staging a coup, eliminating the rule of law, and forming a criminal organization, with potential prison sentences of 11+ years if convicted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol Brasil is taunting us at this point

🙃

Like history is gonna be so funny.

Like imagine reading history and turn to the 2020s and read that:

The world's most powerful country in terms of military strength and diplomatic influence had the option of a prosecutor or a convicted felon with a history of being a shitty person and adjundicated of rape, 2 legit impeachments, and already 1 term of being a shit president...

And the voters still chose the felon.

Then some random "third-world" country has a better democracy and actually prosecute coup plotters and traitors.

🤦‍♂️

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean if you include that the voters had to choose between the felon, and the party that didn't punish the felon in any meaningful way, readers would understand why voters didn't feel their vote mattered.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Shame on them for describing reality.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Are you referring to you in the third person right now after claiming nothing was done right after this turd was impeached twice but the tied senate couldn't make a meaningful move, or are you openly stating that you're fucking retarded?

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Nothing was done, Trump was not affected in any meaningful way, hence why he is president elect instead of rotting in a prison cell or assassinated.

Merrick Garland, the AG appointed by the dems, chose not to move ahead with the charges in such a way to get trump locked up. They could have replaced him at any time.

But I'm sure the democrats wanted to, they just didn't have the power. Weird how the republicans always find a way to do what their base wants, but democrats are always blocked by norms or blocking the party or senate rules or the parliamentarian, or whatever bullshit.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 4 points 17 hours ago

The guy who tried to shoot Trump did more to stop Trump than Garland did.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I shouldn't have been that much of an asshole, and for that I'm sorry.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-votes-to-acquit-trump-for-role-in-capitol-attack

|The verdict, on a vote of 57-43,

Meaningful change wasn't possible. Well maybe it was possible, but politically not possible.

The question of the DoJ, an executive organization prosecuting and convicting s president was always in the favor of presidents. It just wasn't a reliable way to go. It had hope, but it turns out that's not enough.

I've said this a few times, and I'll say it again, this is going to take violence from the people before any meaningful change happens.

Trying to say "both sides same" is not helping anyone at all.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I'm not saying both sides are the same, I'm saying democrats chose not to do what was necessary to neutralize trump or even get reelected, instead grandstanding with impeachments they knew wouldn't have any effect.

Meaningful change wasn’t possible. Well maybe it was possible, but politically not possible.

We're about to see what is and isn't "politically not possible". Spoiler: The American executive is one of the most powerful executives of any country outside of the gulf monarchies and maybe Russia and France in what it can do unilaterally.