this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Technik

330 readers
45 users here now

die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann

Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Well, backdoor for "good actors" is always a backdoor for everyone

Not like all the privacy groups were shouting that since ever...

Edit: and how can this still be regarded as E2E, when it's obviously not?

"But end-to-end encryption over texts between Apple devices and Android devices, for instance, aren’t encrypted in the same way, meaning they were vulnerable to interception by Salt Typhoon, according to the Times."

What is it I don't understand here?
If it's E2E, then nobody could intercept my messages in a meaningful way.
How is this still possible, when messages went from iOS to Android - or the other way round?
At least Signal still holds strong, disregarding the OS

[–] smokeysnilas 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel E2E has become a marketing term and companies don't hold the promise e.g. "it's E2E but one end is your device and the other end is my server"

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Well, that would be really shit and wrong marketing

Hopefully you're wrong and this doesn't take hold :⁠-⁠\

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like normal SMS texting or unencrypted RCS messaging between iOS and Android phones rather than E2EE

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks!

Never had a RCS conversation and didn't really look into it.
Do you're probably right, that it's about that.