this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
823 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

11217 readers
2209 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'd love to hear about any studies explaining the mechanism of human cognition.

Right now it's looking pretty neural-net-like to me. That's kind of where we got the idea for neural nets from in the first place.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

It's not specifically related, but biological neurons and artificial neurons are quite different in how they function. Neural nets are a crude approximation of the biological version. Doesn't mean they can't solve similar problems or achieve similar levels of cognition , just that about the only similarity they have is "network of input/output things".

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At every step of modern computing people have thought that the human brain looks like the latest new thing. This is no different.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Past results are no guarantee of future performance.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

But claims of what future performance will be as given by people with careers, companies, and life changing amounts of money on the line are also no guarantee either.

The world would be a very different place if technology had advanced as predicted not even ten years ago.

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago

Not a guarantee, no. A very, very strong predictor though. You have to have some kind of evidence beyond just vibes to start making claims that this time is totally different from all the others before anyone should take you seriously.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I’d love to hear about any studies explaining the mechanism of human cognition.

You're just asking for any intro to cognitive psychology textbook.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Ehhh.... It depends on what you mean by human cognition. Usually when tech people are talking about cognition, they're just talking about a specific cognitive process in neurology.

Tech enthusiasts tend to present human cognition in a reductive manor that for the most part only focuses on the central nervous system. When in reality human cognition includes anyway we interact with the physical world or metaphysical concepts.

There's something called the mind body problem that's been mostly a philosophical concept for a long time, but is currently influencing work in medicine and in tech to a lesser degree.

Basically, it questions if it's appropriate to delineate the mind from the body when it comes to consciousness. There's a lot of evidence to suggest that that mental phenomenon are a subset of physical phenomenon. Meaning that cognition is reliant on actual physical interactions with our surroundings to develop.