this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
482 points (91.7% liked)

Lefty Memes

4391 readers
668 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

So if you were equally qualified what should the manager think about when deciding between you two?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Flip a coin because I don't hire unlucky people

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They should choose the more qualified, if there's literally no difference I suppose to be totally fair it should be random.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What qualifies being qualified for a job? Should I hire the person who knows a little bit less but is really pleasant to be around and like learning new things or the person who clearly knows more but is a huge pain to be around, thinks he's better than everyone else, and doesn't think he has anything more to learn?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Whatever your criteria are, as long as they aren't based on protected characteristics such as race, gender, etc

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So what you're telling me is that being "qualified" isn't the only criteria... But I thought you said the only thing that mattered was hiring the most qualified person...

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

Qualified is intentionally a vague metric as it can include anything that makes you suitable for the job. What it does not include are protected characteristics.

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

I take it you've never been a hiring manager or worked in HR. Hires are almost never made on an objective basis, the bias of interviewers/assessors inevitably affect outcomes. In the absence of positive discrimination, on average, this means unfair outcomes for minorities (because some people are bigots and most people have unconscious bias against out-groups).

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

I'll let you in on a secret. In these situations where you have two similarly qualified candidates, if one is actually more qualified in some small way, the employer doesn't have any way of telling which one that is during the hiring process. It's not that precise.