this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
849 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

60073 readers
3272 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853884

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853256

To whom it may concern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 58 points 1 month ago (4 children)

As much as I dislike Musk, expansion of the great firewall of Europe seems like a bad idea.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

+1

They should discourage institutions from using it (and use government Mastadon instances of course). This is honestly long overdue.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yep they should keep fining him exponentially till he leaves (he obviously will never fall in line with EU rules)

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They only need to expand it a little bit. Add a rule against Nazi websites, and enforce it. That's not restrictive very much at all. Drag has gone drag's entire life without relying on Nazi sites

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol. That's true. I suspect that Xitter doesn't have the staff or engineering talent left to pivot to enforce any new rules internally. It should be possible to catch them in a constant automated ban without hitting anything worthwhile.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To operate there they would have to hire the staff back then, or not do so. That said, usually intent is all that matters, so if something gets through, so long as you showed efforts to prevent it and remove it in a reasonable manner, they would be fine.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure but an automated ban and manual review and removal could easily leave them blocked for more hours than not, each day.

Sure but, yeah.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does the article say anything about censorship? Usually bans like this are financial. So X offices would close in the EU and bank accounts seized and they wouldn't be allowed to conduct business (eg with advertisers) in the EEA

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It specifically cites Brazil as an example, that involved a complete block of the website.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

More than that. The Brazil government made it illegal for it's citizens to access the site, as well as the use of a VPN. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazil, chapter 'Blocking').

I think it's a swell idea, banning your citizens from reading information you decide is wrong.