this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
192 points (70.5% liked)

Greentext

4460 readers
1290 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They had legitimate reason to believe they were in danger. ~~Not assault at all.~~ Unlikely to be assault.

Edit: Guess I shouldn’t say “definitely not assault”. Don’t have all the information here, so can’t come to any definitive conclusions.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Legitimate reason as in "a man is in the range of visibility"?

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

A man, in a hoodie, that speeds up his step when they try to walk away from him faster, at 2am. Context matters a lot here.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s more than just “a man within range of vision”. Obviously we don’t have the full story here, but even in the text, there are specific behaviors that would, arguably, make a reasonable person suspect they were in imminent danger. Depending on the state, that is enough to trigger self-defense definition.