this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
987 points (98.3% liked)

Programming Humor

2734 readers
215 users here now

Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev

Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure it's not lack of user feedback. It's MBAs deciding the user is wrong and unprofitable, therefore better add more tracking and ads.

[–] namarupa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Exactly. These companies have more feedback than they could ever parse. They only listen if said feedback results in loss of profit.

[–] CtrlAltDyeet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yup, and not just ads. At one of my jobs at a SECURITY company the bugs are considered a liability. Features were prioritised, vulnerabilities be damned.

After that experience I doubt most proprietary software is more secure than open source