this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
195 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3844 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (17 children)

Only scabs cross the line.

I come from a union family and walked way further than I thought it would be to see sanders speak at a union hall. Worth it.

The strike that happened a week or so before the event would have had me staying home, had it extended, though. Even tho I only ever saw one single person on the picket line. Only scabs cross the line.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (15 children)

What sucks is that in this economy, employers know that they can get scabs to come in at like a dollar more an hour—union be damned.

We need to get back to where employers feared, or at least listened to, unions and their power of collective bargaining. They’ve done an amazing job of gutting unions, and will not stop until they are made illegal.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

4.1 percent unemployment is not a sign of an economy that favors bringing in scabs.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Come work for a week in a plant. We make shit wages, work way too hard for it, and see the economy as grocery bills being double what they were a few years ago. Most of us struggle to make ends meet. I can’t blame those that would cross a picket line to make $2 more per hour for less work.

The unemployment rate is a terrible way to gauge how the job market is.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

I don't doubt any of what you are saying and I support you. However "this economy" isn't the problem. This current economy has been fueling the first expansion of union membership in decades. That doesn't mean it's going to help every worker in every industry, but that's due to industry specific factors, not the economy as a whole.

I don't know your industry, and I don't know what Biden might have done or not done to impact your situation. All I'm saying is that the broader economy isn't the issue.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)