this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
601 points (94.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3523 readers
3 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.world
601
Considering last night's results, I don't expect NATO to be credible 4 years from now (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iwndwyt@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight, you're siding with the enemy occupation? If not, then why would you have a problem with a sovereign nation retaking their own country.

"A stay-behind operation is one where a country places secret operatives or organizations in its own territory, for use in case of a later enemy occupation. The stay-behind operatives would then form the basis of a resistance movement, and act as spies from behind enemy lines."

They leave spies in their own territory when being invaded in order to get their country back. How dare they‽