this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
601 points (92.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5706 readers
3385 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is not my personal opinion, I know Gen Z men who voted for Harris. But the voter demographics really speak for themselves, and maybe now people will look at the radicalization of young men as a serious (but solvable) issue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 61 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It seems counter intuitive but I don’t think Gen Z is as good with technology as most people assume they are.

I think they just believe everything they see on YouTube and TikTok. Those algorithms just feed people what they want to see and don’t challenge anyone.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 23 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Who thinks they're good with technology? They've never had technology that requires any more knowledge than how to swipe. They're shit with technology.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Who thinks they're good with technology?

Millennials, it's the only thing we're good at, we suck at everything else...

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

I meant who thinks zoomers are good with technology.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We killed napkins motherfucker

Also stigma about depression, no stigma when you're the majority.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

We killed napkins

Do you use your sleeve? I don’t understand.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean that many people just assume younger generations are better with technology.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Do they? That's what I'm asking, who thinks that? I don't know anyone who thinks zoomers are good with technology.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I personally don’t, but it’s a sentiment I hear around me from time to time in the workplace or on TV.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

That’s been a common and roughly true trope for a long time, but I think we may have hit the point where high technology has been ubiquitous for multiple generations now and it’s probably not quite as true as it once was (that the younger generation is always better with technology than the previous)

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 32 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Yep. Older people (Millennial, Gen X) grew up with PCs that could be heavily modified, run any program, even repurposed to run Linux if you were brave. Later generations who grew up with phones only get to use the apps that Apple / Google approve of. There's no hacking the system, so you get whatever the algorithm says you get.

Older people grew up on BBSes and later "Bulletin Boards", which were mostly the same thing just with prettier graphics, also with email, and sometimes instant messengers. Communities were smaller, and there was no mediator. Younger ones are stuck in apps that are designed around engagement, with a "celebrity" vs "fan" content model where it's all geared around followers and likes. It's all parasocial relationships from the "fan" side, and trying to keep up with whatever the algorithm wants from the creator side.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It really fucking sucks that platforms that used to be designed to allow 2-way communication between equals have flopped so hard trying to follow the exact model you just outlined. For all its faults, Facebook used to be a really great place to keep in contact with long distance friends and family. Now it won't even show you anything anyone in your friends list posts, and the options for interacting are completely neutered on their mobile site. It went from being a site I enjoyed, to a site I despise. And there aren't any alternatives. The era of a platform for friends and family is over.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 minutes ago

The only reason Facebook was at all successful is that they made it easy to migrate over from MySpace.

Before Facebook people weren't locked into their social networks. In the early days of BBSes you were mostly on your local BBS, but you could sometimes communicate with another BBS if your BBS was part of FidoNet. When instant messengers like ICQ, AIM, MSN Messenger, etc. became popular, it was common to use a unified program that logged into all of them at once. But, already there was corporate consolidation. BBSes were often run by people out of their own homes, or at least by hobbyists. The early messengers were all commercial products.

Then there were the early social media websites: SixDegrees.com, Classmates.com, Friendster, (LinkedIn), MySpace, Orkut, and in 2004 Facebook. At first Facebook was closed to anybody who wasn't a US university student. You even had to have an email address from a US university to register. But, when they wanted to grow, they made it easy to migrate from other sites, especially MySpace. They released a tool that allowed you to basically stay in touch with your MySpace friends from Facebook, but not the other way around. That slowly drained people away from MySpace until it eventually collapsed. These days, thanks to section 1201 of the DMCA, if you tried to release a tool that allowed people to migrate away from Facebook, you'd be nuked from orbit.

Now, every social media site is a walled garden protected by a moat and an electric fence. Every one is owned by companies worth more than $1b. People can't leave because the FOMO is too strong, but they don't want to stay because the sites are pure shit. You see that especially with Twitter. It is absolute shit since Musk took over, but many people feel like they can't leave. And, when people do leave, do they go to Mastodon, which isn't owned by a corporation? Nope, they mostly go to Threads, owned by Meta, or Bluesky, owned by a lot of the same people behind Twitter.

Unless the governments of the world step in and either break up the tech giants, or require that they are interoperable, I don't know how we back out of this shitty situation.

[–] don@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Xennial here, you speak pure facts.