this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
-30 points (29.2% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2307 readers
106 users here now

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The removed comment 1000006092

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I disagree, but I'm not hitting the downvote button. In my opinion, the downvote button is handy when you want to see what people dislike. (and I like your position on this)

But when it comes to online discussion, I want to discuss. Hence you're reading this. It's a lot more fun, insightful and useful to a forum to actually talk rather than vote in my opinion.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel a well voted thread sorts opinions on any topic from popular to unpopular. Gives people reading an additional dimension to put ideas that exists outside their subjective. And doesnt effect you ability to engage in discussion. Would be nice if u could search by contraversial tho.

Then of course u have the mathematical argument of votes that defaukt u have +1, -1, 0 (neutral) if u remove downvotes u essentialy have +1/2, -1/2 with no neutral forcing you to take a position. This is because a post without downvotes is not sorted against posts with downvotes but only other posts without.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think pushing popularity to the top or bottom is a great way to promote nuance. It's nice for cat pictures, but I don't think it's helpful for discussion