this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
1486 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cool, now bring back single cab light trucks with full length beds.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Id settle just for a truck that isnt very clearly pandering "im a big boy!" energy. There all way too fucking big for no god damn reason other than validation of ego. Bunch of weak fucking man babies need some million ton 3 lane wide truck just so they can pretend theyre a big strong man to themselves and everyone else, despite never using the truck for what its purpose is supposed to be.

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have heard that the reason for this is that trucks in that size range are less regulated by the EPA. Companies didn't want to put in the research to develop trucks that met emissions standards, so they just make them really heavy for no purpose, evading regulations. Take this with a grain of salt, because I've done zero research of my own on it.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I think any truck gets a pass. Even a Honda Civic raised an inch or two, slap a bigger greenhouse on it, and send it on it's way as a CUV.

I suspect the growth spurt has more to do with "tax loophole trucks." I might be wrong on both points.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

I'd buy an electric one. I don't need to haul a trailer or anything huge.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

YES! Where is my dad's little Toyota Pickup? Closest thing we have is the Ford Maverick, which is still pretty fucking huge.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Indeed, Nissan should respond with their e-Power hybrid too. Toyota applied for a patent using the Stout name in South America.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Was always a fan of the tacoma they were making before they increased the size of it, thing was kind of the perfect size. Roomy enough cabin, small enough to be drivable in a parking lot, enough bed for towing occasionally.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe a Ford Maverick or a Honda Ridgeline. The other trucks are just unreasonable. $80K for a Tundra, or $60K for a Tacoma? WTF!!!

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

RIGHT?? I want an 8-foot bed, dammit!