Asklemmy

43936 readers

468 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

122

Why is it not grave robbery to take artefacts from ancient graves and put them in a museum? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 3 weeks ago by tux0r to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As I was reading about the Valley of the Kings again, I wonder why that was actually legal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

passed in 1990

Yeah it's all about respecting indigenous heritage, sure. Remind me again, in which year they dismantled the genocider statues at Rushmore?

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you had actually ASKED the Sioux of the Black Hills about this, you'd know they've told pretty much everyone "yeah we don't like Mt Rushmore, we don't like Crazy Horse's relief carving either, but we think destroying them is more disrespectful than just leaving them to fall apart on their own." Like, this isn't an uncommon thought. It's just more complex than "blow them up".