this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
130 points (95.1% liked)

PCGaming

6449 readers
2 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
CSFFlame@lemmy.world
130
As the Prince of Persia Metroidvania team disbands, Baldur's Gate 3 dev says if Ubisoft wants "subs over sales" then "developers must get used to not having jobs" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 3 days ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol, lmao they deserve it for saying such asinine shit.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's not the devs saying it, but it's the devs who are punished

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Never said the devs did. Ubisoft execs said it and they deserve it.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

the quote is literally "developers must get used to not having jobs"

execs aren't the ones losing jobs with layoffs

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 days ago

If the statement “gamers should get used to not owning their games” is true because of a specific release strategy (sub above sales), then the statement “developers must get used to not having jobs if they make a critically acclaimed game” (platform strategy above title sales) is also true, and that just isn’t sensible — even from a business perspective.

The Larian guy isn't saying the quote seriously. He's saying it's the natural conclusion of the Ubisoft strategy and that it's bad for everyone, so Ubisoft better change their strategy.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Execs are the ones ordering the layoffs. The devs can make a worker co-op since they are the ones that actually produce shit.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

note that even in your fantasy the execs aren't losing out

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Losing all their employees is not losing out, right.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

correct, because they'll just wriggle off to another company

you know you can just admit you read the title wrong and said something stupid, rather than doubling down? rather than pretending you meant something completely different

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I dont regret what I said. Ubisoft deserves to lose all its developers. Contrary to your belief, this will not kill the devs. Tech industries in general would benefit from alternative forms of management in business. They should all lose their jobs, and make a worker co-op that Ubisoft has no rights to. But go off, Pete, you sassy ancap.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

workers losing their jobs while executives keep theirs is bad

"go off sassy ancap" good lord it's like talking to a child

have a good one, mate

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well as long as the workers have Stockholm syndrome and dont want to leave then yeah. But if you sap the talent out of a place, that talent wasn't rented by the worker from the company. They take it with them. You're under the impression these devs will go home and just sit on the floor. Not at all.