this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
16 points (83.3% liked)

Europe

1557 readers
384 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
federalreverse
poVoq@slrpnk.net
anzo@programming.dev
16
Car industry crisis: Automobile workers don't believe taxing Chinese EVs is the solution (www.euronews.com)
submitted 1 month ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/europe
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/45300137

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] federalreverse 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess the answer lies up the supply chain: Automakers have historically provided well-paid, cushy union jobs to their direct employees. However, that business model has increasingly depended on squeezing the supply chain. E.g. a relative used to work at a automotive supplier around 10 years ago โ€” their blue collar workers got the 8.xโ‚ฌ/h German minimum wage while employees at VW in the same region got 3x that plus an assortment of benefits.

At the same time, modern cars include a lot of electronics that aren't even produced within the EU at all (and EV batteries are the worst bit here). Hence, European car manufacturers depend on products imported from China to create functionally and economically competitive cars. A trade war with China could upend that symbiosis.

(Fwiw, you'll also notice that one of the union representatives at the end hints that they want government subsidies of some sort.)

[โ€“] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fwiw, you'll also notice that one of the union representatives at the end hints that they want government subsidies of some sort.

That would be incompatible with EU common market although with the weight of France I guess rule bending is not out of question. This sounds like a viscous cycle though, trying to outspend China which has fiscal and monetary policy built entirely on stimulating domestic growth, at the cost of crazy capital controls.

[โ€“] federalreverse 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There are lots of options for legal subsidies. Really, the only issue is whether you can legally specify that you only want to incentivize domestic production (like the IRA does in the US).

Just from my German context, I can name a couple of subsidies that have helped/are helping the car industry, particularly by making it a lot cheaper to own a (new) car:

  • The "diesel privilege" boosts diesel cars for extremely dodgy environmental reasons (you need a bit less diesel to go the same way than petrol ...). To this day, the tax on diesel is lower than on gas in Germany. (Dieselgate is the indirect outcome of this: It happened as German car manufacturers started trying to export their domestically opex-reduced diesel cars to countries where owning a diesel car brought no opex benefit, while those countries tightened emissions standards.)
  • The "environmental incentive" was supposed to boost the automotive industry in 2009/2010 and allowed you to get paid for scrapping 9+ years-old cars.
  • The "company car privilege" allows for very low taxes on employer-leased cars.
  • The "environmental bonus" used to provide a subsidy for buying new electric/hybrid cars.
  • The "greenhouse gas reduction quota" allows you to sell the "saved" CO2 emissions of your electric car every year.
  • The "commuter's lump sum" begets you income tax rebates if you use a car to travel to work.