Opensource

1439 readers

42 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

pylapp@programming.dev

315

The developer of Rogue Legacy has officially released its source code 'in the pursuit of sharing knowledge' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 month ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/opensource@programming.dev

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Custom license, not free for commercial use. Assets are still proprietary. https://github.com/flibitijibibo/RogueLegacy1/blob/main/LICENSE.md

I guess the main benefactor will be the modding scene. Indie devs can make deals with Cellar Door Studios to get a commercial licence with additional conditions. It might be close to open source in practice if the commercial licences are handed out generously.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Sounds reasonable for a game’s source code to me, I don’t see anyone claiming it’s “open source”

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 15 points 1 month ago

Makes sense to protect the studio's reputation against potential droves of crappy, barely altered clones with scam ads.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, we are in the lemmy subforum named "open source" so its implied.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Fair point!

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

Regarding the proprietary assets, I used to give it some thought, and came to a conclusion that other than selling consultance services, selling assets is the only way to make money while creating something open source. That's why now I don't find proprietary assets to be something bad.