this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1240 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9670 readers
75 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No thanks, I’d rather just skip to banning cars

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Someone will counter with “but the US is really a big place …” and you’ll have a completely counterproductive argument.

Or you could focus on better alternatives to cars. When that works, focus on better alternatives to more car uses. When that works, focus on whatever people keep using cars the most for

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and what alternative to cars (other than ATVs and private planes) can work outside of citys?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trains, they can be called upon and carry larger machinery than trucks

It’s inside cities that those are inefficient