this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
576 points (96.6% liked)

Science Memes

10587 readers
2988 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How would you scientifically measure a difference between those two definitions?

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean, say this doctor has a 100% success rate but another doctor has 0%. Those two doctors collectively have a 50% success rate but it you have far better odds with the first doctor than the second

[–] TheyCallMeHacked@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The two doctors would only have a combined 50% success rate if they perform the same number of surgeries

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

After a certain point, it's really society's fault for letting the surgeon batting 0 continue performing surgeries.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That surgeon is bound to get one right one of these days!

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

It's just statistics.

[–] sk@hub.utsukta.org 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

@Cenotaph Nope, say the first doctor did 100 successful cases, the other did 2 successful and 2 failed, then the collective would be (100+2)*100/104 = 98.07%

So the number of cases would matter.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 23 points 3 days ago

Of course. My point was only that there is definitely a difference between an individual doctor's success rate and the overall success rate of a procedure across all doctors, responding to the commment I replied to.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

98.07 for the surgery in general but not if you have decided to go to the first doctor. Then the 50% chance of the second doctor doesn't not come into the equation, assuming surgery is done by the first doctor who is independent of second doctor. Hope that makes more sense.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

In a statistical regression model, that would be a variable that encodes a specific individual; although encoding hypothetical (the scientific meaning of that word, not the layperson meaning) attributes of that individual is probably functionally equivalent, more useful, and easier to conduct.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Attributes of the surgeons is not easier, because you need to pick the correct attributes.

Really you just need an indicator variable showing 1 if its data from the surgeon under analysis and zero otherwise.

Then test for that indicator variable being statistically larger than 0.