this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13261 readers
7 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They cite Wikipedia for the definition of "microsecond'...

[–] Thavron@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What's wrong with citing Wikipedia for factual things like this?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not a fact about the world but a definition of a somewhat common word. One can say "30 microseconds (30 millionths of a second)" or "hippos are herbivorous (plant-eating)" without a citation because any dictionary will do. In fact, including the citation makes a science journalist seem incompetent as it suggests they needed to look up the term.

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

You shouldn't cite wikipedia...