this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
623 points (90.6% liked)

Political Memes

5339 readers
2793 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'd have a lot more respect if there was a third party candidate running for my district's house seat.

That would mean they're actually trying to build election infrastructure.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Running for office costs lots of money and time. There are seats that go entirely uncontested, because the incumbent is too popular to challenge. I would love to see a 50-state Green strategy, too. I just don't know who the 500+ candidates are supposed to be.

That would mean they’re actually trying to build election infrastructure.

I'm not sure where this "Greens never try to build anything" theory of politics came from. But if you think partisanship is savage at the national level, wait till you try and run as a Green candidate for municipal office. Talking about bike lanes in the wrong kind of county gets a certain kind of person shooting mad.

City elections are a mess on a good day, and a lot of it really boils down to which person the Mega-Church, the Millionaires, and the Morning Zoo Crew decide to endorse.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Local government is fucking awful. Think of an HOA and then make them accountable to the whiniest assholes in town. Just watch any footage of local meetings on YouTube to see what I mean.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Oh I don't mean they need to contest every seat that's an unrealistic standard. But they certainly aren't going to be a real choice until they have election infrastructure in every state. So we're looking at about 100 elections of varying offices. And yeah, that takes time to build. Showing up in the last 6 months of the presidential campaign every 4 years is not how you get elected. AOC and others have shown that mainstream democrats are vulnerable in some of those seats that aren't usually contested. And yeah you're going to get gerrymandered out of seats a few times until you have a large enough group in the state legislature.

Saying it's too much work to expect for a third party is just ridiculous. Nobody is going to just hand you a victory on the national stage.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

But they certainly aren’t going to be a real choice until they have election infrastructure in every state.

Infrastructure costs money and manpower. Money tends to come from people looking to buy political favors. You can't dole out political favors if you're not in power. So power entrenches itself, with a single party dominating a particular seat by way of a patronage system.

And yeah, that takes time to build.

It has been built. Show me a state and I'll show you a Green Party chapter. But it also decays without reinforcement. And it decays rapidly when the party becomes a scapegoat for deficiencies in one of the Big Two.

We see this with Libertarians as well. Every time the GOP loses, they take a big chunk of blame. People lose enthusiasm as they start getting yelled at by MAGA psychos accusing them of being Deep State agents of the Dem Party. Etc, etc. And eventually, they fold back into the GOP, rather than solidifying as their own party, when the GOP big dollar donors entice them into the tent again.

I suspect that's what we'll see with Greens. A mix of public shaming and private bribing will reincorporate them into the Dem Party where they can be more easily controlled.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

To be fair the Greens have made a massive mistake with Jill Stein. They aren't going to be the big third party that eventually breaks through unless they seriously reform. But no, a chapter in every state is not the infrastructure you need. Not beyond the most reductive meaning at any rate. You need to be a household name. You need to have been present in the state level political scene already. Election infrastructure is hundreds of people showing up every day to make millions of calls. Thousands of volunteers papering neighborhoods. Supporting PACs and local relationships to generate endorsements. A hundred members who meet once a month isn't going to cut it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To be fair the Greens have made a massive mistake with Jill Stein.

She's been the sacrificial lamb election cycle after election cycle because she's willing to do the job. If Cornel West hadn't withdrawn, I could have seen him as a better choice. But given the smearing every Green candidate since Nader has endured, I don't really blame him for wanting to stay out of the mud.

You need to be a household name. You need to have been present in the state level political scene already.

You need billions of dollars to operate at that level. Hell, even the party primaries are these enormous luxurious affairs. So much of this really does just boil down to money, which comes from people looking to buy access to the candidates.

Supporting PACs and local relationships to generate endorsements.

Who are the local Green candidates going to get to form PACs on their behalf? You either have a die-hard ideologue like Perot who bankrolls the entire party out of his tech industry fortune, or you have a scattered amalgamation of independent activists who congeal around a third party banner.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When you're getting enough house seats and state legislature seats you can start working on PACs, nobody is going to give you a PAC before you've done the work.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When you’re getting enough house seats and state legislature seats

Where do you get the money to build the organization to win these seats? States don't just give them away. A house district can run north of 600,000 residents and cost more than half-a-million in donations to compete in. Even state legislative races are enormous, expensive affairs. And that's before you get into the incumbency racket of gerrymandered seats and access journalism.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are a few ways.

Start in highly walkable areas, where meeting voters is better than spending on TV ads.

Go for seats that aren't typically contested so the national money isn't showing up.

Run for city or council seats first so your name brand builds

Open community service organizations that are co-branded with your party so people know they're voting for the organizers of the soup kitchen.

There are ways of doing it. Just throwing your hands in the air isn't going to get it done.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Start in highly walkable areas

Functionally non-existent in the suburbs and exurbs.

Go for seats that aren’t typically contested so the national money isn’t showing up.

These seats are uncontested because they're the safest, either due to gerrymandering or natural partisan disposition. In cases like this, you are far better off challenging an incumbent in a primary (as AOC did in NY-14) than the general. But to challenge a candidate in a primary, you need to be a member of the party.

Run for city or council seats first so your name brand builds

Plenty of candidates go this route. But, again, you run into the incumbency racket. Municipal offices in urban districts (you know, the places with highly walkable areas?) have residencies in the hundreds-of-thousands.

That said, if you look at where Green/Libertarian candidates are most successful, this is it. The non-partisan nature of the districts, combined with the large number of no-name candidates who aim for the position, can produce the occasional opportunity for a Green pickup. It's not a bad idea on face, but still difficult under the best of circumstances.

Open community service organizations that are co-branded with your party

Once again, a thing that requires large quantities of money. This is the crux of any "Why don't you just start more grassroots-like with your organization?" critique. You need money. And if you've got money, you'll just align with one of the two big parties that explicitly cater to the wealthy.

There are ways of doing it.

In terra nullis conditions, sure. But when all the turf is stacked out, you're swimming against the tide.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

START in urban areas.

And safe just means the other party doesn't have enough support. It says nothing about third party sentiment.

And yeah they have a lot of people, nobody said it was going to be easy. But it's a different path than dropping into a Congress race with a personal 5 million dollar buy in.

And community service orgs also don't start with million dollar budgets.

You keep assuming you must put the cart before the horse. Of course everything looks impossible to you.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Green party will never break through and be a viable 3rd option. Period. The Democrats and Republicans control and have ultimate influence over American politics.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A third party could absolutely work but it must come from the bottom up. FPTP sets a high bar but not an insurmountable one. The Green party will never work without reform because they're doing nothing but spoiler work every four years.

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You'd have a lot more respect for whom/what?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago