this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
623 points (90.6% liked)

Political Memes

5339 readers
2803 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Start in highly walkable areas

Functionally non-existent in the suburbs and exurbs.

Go for seats that aren’t typically contested so the national money isn’t showing up.

These seats are uncontested because they're the safest, either due to gerrymandering or natural partisan disposition. In cases like this, you are far better off challenging an incumbent in a primary (as AOC did in NY-14) than the general. But to challenge a candidate in a primary, you need to be a member of the party.

Run for city or council seats first so your name brand builds

Plenty of candidates go this route. But, again, you run into the incumbency racket. Municipal offices in urban districts (you know, the places with highly walkable areas?) have residencies in the hundreds-of-thousands.

That said, if you look at where Green/Libertarian candidates are most successful, this is it. The non-partisan nature of the districts, combined with the large number of no-name candidates who aim for the position, can produce the occasional opportunity for a Green pickup. It's not a bad idea on face, but still difficult under the best of circumstances.

Open community service organizations that are co-branded with your party

Once again, a thing that requires large quantities of money. This is the crux of any "Why don't you just start more grassroots-like with your organization?" critique. You need money. And if you've got money, you'll just align with one of the two big parties that explicitly cater to the wealthy.

There are ways of doing it.

In terra nullis conditions, sure. But when all the turf is stacked out, you're swimming against the tide.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

START in urban areas.

And safe just means the other party doesn't have enough support. It says nothing about third party sentiment.

And yeah they have a lot of people, nobody said it was going to be easy. But it's a different path than dropping into a Congress race with a personal 5 million dollar buy in.

And community service orgs also don't start with million dollar budgets.

You keep assuming you must put the cart before the horse. Of course everything looks impossible to you.