this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
200 points (96.7% liked)

Firefox

17740 readers
10 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA Keeping the internet, and the content that makes it a vital and vibrant part of our global society, free and accessible has

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ziviz@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A fundamental flaw in this, is it still involves user data, even if "anonymized". You can advertise without any user data. We do it all the time. Does a television channel know your gender? Does a radio station know if you bought a car recently? Does the newspaper know your hobbies?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Non targeted advertising isn't as profitable. (It lacks dark patterns)

For what its worth I still watch over the air TV

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

A fundamental flaw in this, is it still involves user data, even if “anonymized”. You can advertise without any user data.

Right. The reassurance is supposed to be: "don't worry, no personalized data is retained." So, ideally, no individual record of you, with your likes, your behaviors, your browser fingerprint, aggregated together with whatever third party provider data might be purchased, and machine learning inferences can be derived from that. Instead, there's a layer of abstraction, or several layers. Like "people who watch Breaking Bad also like Parks and Rec and are 12% more likely to be first generation home buyers". Several abstracted identity types can be developed and refined.

Okay, but who ordered that? Why is that something that we think satisfies us that privacy is retained? You're still going to try and associate me with an abstract machine learned identity that, to your best efforts, closely approximates what you think I like and what is most persuasive to me. I don't think people who are interested in privacy feel reassured at anonymized repurposing of data.

It's the model itself, it's the incentives inherent in advertising as an economic model, at the end of the day. I don't know that there's a piecemeal negotiation that is supposed to stand in for our interests to reassure us, or whose idea was that this third way was going to be fine.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, they actually CAN know those things.

[–] Far@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe they're referring to demographic statistics of listeners/watchers (via surveys or something)

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago

Thats a good point, those ads are far less profitable though, and as a result if mozilla offered that kind of service nobody would use it

[–] HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan -2 points 1 week ago

Yes they have known these things for decades