this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
622 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12383 readers
1052 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Crossposted from !worldnews@lemmit.online

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

If it works well for the job that it's tasked to perform, why change it? It's got the added benefit of being an unintentional security feature now too, as very few others will even have a drive for reading them. Sort of like how manual transmissions are much less likely to be stolen now.

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is a great point, but it probably doesn't do the job as well as more modern alternatives.

  1. Easy to lose, possible data leak concerns.
  2. Easy to retain data that should have been deleted.
  3. Easy to lose data if a disk gets lost or damaged.
  4. Likely wastes time when trying to track down the disk you need to getting someone to transfer it.
  5. Lack of access logs and auditing capabilities.
  6. Easy way for viruses to spread.

Modern IT managed file servers solve a lot of real problems when well-managed.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 3 points 4 months ago

All of those are true of even smaller USB drives (which has been a problem here).

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

On the other hand, if you use an old technology that isn't being mass produced anymore, it can reach a point where it will become a big liability for a mission-critical piece of equipment.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

I think there was something about the US government having to finally get rid of vacuum tubes because the only suppliers were in Russia.

[–] Mpatch@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yah this is bad I run a cnc plasma table, big table 10 feet x 20 feet. It uses floppy disks. Pain in the ass to find a new drive and pain in the ass to find new disks because constant write re write emf and metal dust kills them. But despite that it's still cheaper and easier than a $15k retro fit to a more modern controler.

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 months ago

If it works well for the job

Your example is one where it clearly isn't a great fit for the job. If you wanted to transfer sensitive data discretely, a floppy could be significantly better than a wired network where you've got to worry about America/Russia/China/Israel/Iran and who knows who else peeping on the transfer, or a USB drive which is already known to be compromised by stuxnet derivatives.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 7 points 4 months ago

The most practical reasons are that both the drives and media are getting harder to find.