this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
147 points (88.1% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3181 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (14 children)

And I was impressed by Seagate launching their Mozaic 3+ 32TB HDDs...

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (10 children)

That's honestly intense. I would be terrified of having that much data in one place

[–] adavis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

While not hard drives, at $dayjob we bought a new server out with 16 x 64TB nvme drives. We don't even need the speed of nvme for this machines roll. It was the density that was most appealing.

It feels crazy having a petabytes of storage (albeit with some lost to raid redundancy). Is this what it was like working in tech up till the mid 00s with significant jumps just turning up?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is exactly what it was like, except you didn't need it as much.

Storage used to cover how much a person needed and maybe 2-8x more, then datasets shot upwards with audio/mp3, then video, then again with Ai.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well hell, it's not like it's your money.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

a petabye of ssds is probably cheaper than a petabye of hdds when you account for rack costs, electricity costs, and maintenance.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Not a problem I've ever faced before, admittedly

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The size increase in hard drives around that time was insane. Compared to the mid-90's which was just a decade ago, hard drives capacities increased around 100 times. On average, drive capacities were doubling every year.

Then things slowed down. In the past 20 years, we've maybe increased the capacities 30-40 times for hard drives.

Flash memory, on the other hand, is a different story. Sometime around 2002-3 or so I paid something like $45 for my first USB flash drive - a whole 128MB of storage. Today I can buy one that's literally 1000 times larger, for around a third of that price. (I still have that drive, and it still works too!)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)