this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
644 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59599 readers
3401 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 92 points 1 month ago (158 children)

I can see criminals easily exploiting this default behavior to stop the car and steal from those inside.

Where's a Johnny cab when you need it, it knows how to deal with criminals.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I doubt choosing to stick up a vehicle covered in cameras with someone who likely isn't even carrying cash is anyone's idea of a good payoff.

[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

idk i think plenty of people carry expensive stuff on them

what a thief could actually get for them is another matter but clearly that doesnt stop them from trying

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Where’s a Johnny cab when you need it

Or a Delamain.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My car isn’t driverless, but I as the driver have less control than ever before.

It’s an EV, and it will not shift to drive or reverse if the charging cable is attached.

Great for preventing me from destroying a charger. Terrible for getting away from someone trying to mug me.

Far too much of the safety features these days assume an environment in which all harm is accidental. This comes at the cost of safety in environments where someone is trying to harm another person.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the seatbelt argument all over again. The safety features protect people in the majority of scenarios. While there may be scenarios where it does more harm than good, they are rare. You’re much safer with the safety feature.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think there is a car where the seat belt is tied to anything besides a little notification beep. Seems like a different situation if the "safety" feature dictates how the car is used.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You don't complain about having to open your door or start the engine when escaping a threat.

Having to unplug a cable during a very specific, imagined threat seems like a niche problem.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Additionally: if you're at a gas station filling an ICE vehicle and you get mugged, and you panic and peel out, there's gas going everywhere, plenty of potential ignition sources etc.

The argument "I have more control and agency therefore I am quantifiably safer" can fuck alllllll the way off. Safety regulations are written in blood.

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did the lady have 5 kids to feed?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (154 replies)