this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1045 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I canceled my Prime membership earlier this year because of that decline in quality. I wish everyone could, but thanks to the loss of retail throughout the country many can't afford not to have it.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Prime is not a money saver. It's a money waster that tricks you into buying more stuff just because "the shipping is free" but you can often get free shipping without Prime or Amazon. Just wait until you need enough stuff to meet the store's free shipping threshold to make an order.

[–] Laser 2 points 1 month ago

At this point, Prime doesn't make sense if you want to save on shipping. It made sense because it included a lot of good stuff (video before ads, some music, shipping, games) but just for shipping, there were better options.

I basically overpaid but didn't care out of convenience - partner sometimes watched prime, I ordered occasionally, played some included games. But the changes to video were so shady that I cancelled it.

Exactly. We weren't using the other services much (we watched a handful of shows on Prime, but that's it), so our only reason was the faster shipping.

So we cancelled Prime and now have to wait a few more days for our package to arrive. The impact was... pretty much non-existent and we've since moved a lot of our shopping elsewhere since shipping times aren't a big draw anymore. I do kind of miss the occasional same-day or next-day deliveries (we live right next to a warehouse), but not enough to justify what we were spending on it.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a feeling the big impact is going to be in other services, namely AWS. Makes me wonder if some new global outages are coming, which are always fun to deal with.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, there's going to be hilariously bad outages at AWS within like a year.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah... I didn't choose it, but some of the services from my employer run there. May be a good time to make some moves, we'll see.

Not really going to be an issue I can fix obviously, but I'll be making even more backups than normal....

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

good time to make some moves

To where? Google? Azure? There's a reason we call them Frugal and Unsure at my side job. If AWS sucks in the next year, that'll barely bring it down to their level. Hell, if AWS sucks ALL NEXT YEAR with a clown-car style outage every week, then maybe.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Considering our use is not to the general public, we'd be better off with an entirely different strategy.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why? Amazon seems to have built an amazing system with AWS, but does it need the same amount of staff time to maintain it that it needed to develop it?

If Amazon acknowledges that it isn't going to be developing new products to the scale it did for the past decade, it probably doesn't need the headcount it had before.

[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Enh, the tech space is very much innovate or die. So yeah, they could probably throw everything in maintenance mode and make a reduced headcount work, but if AWS goes stagnant it's entirely likely that Amazon goes the way of IBM and Motorol. Especially when someone (likely, Microsoft or Google) comes to take a slice of the AWS market share.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

the tech space is very much innovate or die

Is it still? The VC funding has started drying up and every tech company has started worrying about profitability now. I think the old innovate or die mantra has played itself out.

And IBM & Motorola diminished in part because they stuck to older industries where cost became as important as innovation and didn't lower their cost.

Yeah, my entire project lives on AWS. Fortunately, it's not my problem to keep things going, so I guess we'll just roll with whatever punches come.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

My relatively poor experience with Prime I attribute to deliberate bad choices rather than lack of workers. It probably doesn't help to be sure, but even with the most awesome staff, I think Prime was going to suck no matter what. The whole economy is particularly "screw the customers over, get us money now, no need to attract or retain customers now"

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah. The rise of a monopoly until it starts to enshitify is interesting to watch eh? Reminds me of Walmart in the physical space. All the local options got pushed out and everyone’s quality was forced to drop due to their economic strong arming.