this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
999 points (95.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9677 readers
200 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They seem just as well-suited for busses like in the post.

When there's no bike lane available I'll bike in the middle of the next general lane, so they'll need to use another general lane to pass. They won't give us barely enough room, it's safer to just take the whole lane.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You will be tailgated, honked at, rolled coal, maybe even hit by a mirror on an agressive pass by a truck if caught doing that in my area. I barely even feel safe walking on the sidewalk as most people don't look for pedestrians at intersections or entrances. Yes the lanes are meant for everyone, but the nature of a car or truck means they can easily take more than their fair share of the lane if they want.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In my area they'll do that anyways no matter what we do, they just hate cyclists for being in the way at all. So it's safer to take the lane when they're flying past you with barely any room to pass.

I'd rather take the safer option that makes them angry, than the polite unsafe option and then they're still aggressive anyways.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Compared to a proper bike lane, that is not a safe option. What happens if a distracted driver rear ends you?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Oh no disagreement there, a proper bike lane is safest.