this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
831 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] portuga@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No I don’t get it. But I would like to. Is this one of those scenarios where three physicists walk into a bar, each one tells a joke but none of it are funny so no one gets it?

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The moment I wrote it, I was hearing it in the voice of Benny Safdie in his first scene as weirdo Edward Teller, in "Oppenheimer".

[–] portuga@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Didn’t watch the movie, probably why it went over my head. Sorry 🤷‍♂️

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No Oppenheimer?!!
Your geek credentials are hereby revoked until further notice!
Or until you atone!

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oppenheimer is a mainstream movie though. It's not that geeky.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's a movie about physics, with characters like Niels Bohr featured prominently, which just so happened to be made for general audiences and it was a hit, by a director whose other historical film was about Dunkirk.

Before these movies were made, the subjects were pretty much obscure to the mainstream. Films like these are regarded as risky for large studios, and it's widely acknowledged that Christopher Nolan is on the very short list of directors with the blessing to do absolutely whatever they want at large studio scale and budget and that is not part of a franchise. And by "very short list" I mean people like Stanley Kubrick.

The "mainstream" label on Oppenheimer is incidental, after the fact.

[–] portuga@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I would watch an edit of the movie that only featured the physics part of it. It’s the boring part I don’t have time for

[–] portuga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Subject matter doesn’t appeal to me much, and I’m also not very fond of the lead actor (no particular reason, he’s a great actor) If it serves as consolation I only watched like 15min of barbie, either

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I didn't make it through 5min of Barbie lol

Oppenheimer was good and had nice music too.