Australia

3620 readers

126 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Fluid@aussie.zone

bestusername@aussie.zone

eatham@aussie.zone

Woolworths, Coles sued by ACCC for ‘misleading’ price drop claims (www.smh.com.au)

submitted 2 months ago by zero_gravitas@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“We also allege that in many cases both Woolworths and Coles had already planned to later place the products on a “prices dropped” or “down down” promotion before the price spike, and implemented the temporary price spike for the purpose of establishing a higher “was” price.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A cooperative is one way to start on that: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-10/supermarket-alternative-co-ops-save-money/104078660

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their definition sounds like too much work, would be better to pay someone to do the work

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago

I get the joke, but actually...yes. A co-op doesn't mean the people actually doing the work don't get paid. It actually doesn't even mean not-for-profit, just that the people profiting aren't shareholders, but people who actually have a direct stake in the business. That can be a customer-owned co-op, supplier-owned, worker-owned, or some combination of those. Those groups would be the ones making any profit, in a for-profit co-op. And in a not-for-profit worker- or supplier-owned co-op, the workers (including the CEO) and suppliers still get paid—they're just able to be paid more while selling goods for the same price, or paid the same while achieving a lower price, than a non-co-op business would.