this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
224 points (99.1% liked)

Steam Deck

14415 readers
371 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

With the current rise of PC ARM processor (Apple silicone, Snapdragon X), anyone feel like Steam missed the opportunity when developing Deck with x86 and now they have to stick with it?

I tried Apple MacBook Air M2 with a bunch of games and emulators and it runs amazing while being extremely efficient.

I can run Switch emulator Ryujinx with Mario Kart Deluxe 8 at 60FPS and it only need 12Wh, compared to my PC (i5, 1070) need ~150Wh to do the same thing.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do think that the future of handheld devices is ARM or RISC-V, but the software support isn't there yet and would severely limit what could be played.

[–] proton_lynx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I agree. First we need to solve the Linux compatibility issues, then we can start thinking about new CPU architectures. It would have been too much to deal with at the same time.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nothing stopping them from using an ARM processor for the Deck 2

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The fact that almost no PC games support ARM is stopping them. When lots game developers start releasing ARM or RISC-V versions, then Valve may consider an ARM or RISC-V Steam Deck. They will still have to have an emulator to run the older x86 games though.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is where I'm confused. Games for Mac seem to run fine on both Intel Mac and Apple silicone Mac, and run even better on the later.

The only downside is Apple has dropped support for 32bit so it broke a lot of old games.

If Valve can make Proton to bridge the gap between Windows and Linux, I'm sure they can do something to make x86 games run on ARM (just like Apple did and they're not even focused on gaming, Apple hates gamers)

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

Apple specifically designed their ARM CPUs to be able to efficiently translate x86 code. A generic ARM CPU won't be able to get the same performance. Maybe other manufacturers will do the same as ARM PCs get more common.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

When lots game developers start releasing ARM or RISC-V versions

That is more than a little funny, given Valve's release of Proton, and their stance on Native Linux builds (they recommended against it - just use proton)

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone on Lemmy said that would require Valve to completely rewrite the Proton layer (which they've invested tons of time and money in) and probably the SteamOS would require significant overhaul too. And all the backwards compatibility would be thrown out the window.

Or in other words, that would require Valve to completely redesign the Deck from scratch.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

Considering the trend seems to be a move towards ARM (see Mac M1, Windows on ARM + Window's ARM translation layer) - I wouldnt be surprised if they do exactly that, eventually.

There's already some work that might lead to it. As ARM gains prevalence, I think it'll happen sooner rather than later - once all of those dependencies do all the hard work. The efficiency of ARM for mobile devices like the Steam Deck really just scream for it

[–] saintshenanigans@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Id say the fiasco with the m1 chip and compatibility is staying their hand pretty firmly lol

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

All games are x86, so you’ll get that 10-40% CPU overhead.

Steam itself doesn’t even support 64bit, let alone arm.