this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
734 points (96.9% liked)

US Authoritarianism

786 readers
894 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I would argue that 99% of voters are voting for it.

A good example is Democrats' response to Roe vs Wade repeal. That is to say, except for fundraising, there wasn't one. They raked in a cool $80 million though: https://apnews.com/article/abortion-us-supreme-court-elections-campaigns-8a6e3db27082cc212e9e5183b25e7c32.

When one side actively perpetrates fascism and the other side does nothing to stop it, the difference in rhetoric means absolutely nothing to me.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

Most Americans support ranker choice voting, universal healthcare, paid maternity leave, freedom of choice, etc.

The people aren't the problem, the system is. Our corrupt 2 party system is destroying the US. The only way to save this country is to replace it with a modern multi-party proportional representation system like the system we helped the Germans create after ww2.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

That's oversimplification. Just because you vote Democrat doesn't mean you support all of the policies. There are many practical reasons that come into play.

And your response to Roe is inaccurate. There has been a tremendous amount of pressure in the aftermath of Roe v. Wade. I suppose that many Republicans who lose will do so largely because of Roe. I recall the Dems floating a plan to revise how SCOTUS is staffed, too. It probably won't pass, but it's exactly the kind of thing you are overlooking.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are you on about, she said she wants Roe back. This just reeks of b b b but dems bad!!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So did Joe Biden.

The problem is he did nothing meaningful to restore it. My point is simple: It doesn't matter what you say if you're not going to use the power you have in order to make the change.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It essentially wasn't overturned until he lost the House of Reps. They need House majority, senate majority, presidency, and get rid of the filibuster (which wasn't going to happen with Manchin). All 4 to pass that legislation. It's going to be tough to get them all.

But you don't care about any of that. Your ~~point~~ misinformation is simple: B b b b b but Dems bad!1!!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ACA and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were both passed with a simple majority.

Put simply, you are incorrect. Hard things are possible if a president is willing to work for the; Sadly, Biden was not.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Other things took simple majority, therefore this would take a simple majority too? Outstanding logic. By that logic no one has every filibustered anything, right? If Dobbs was something the GOP wanted, they would have filibustered it.

lol so thanks for exposing your goal of misinformation. I see no point in continuing to rebut your mental gymnastics, so ciao.

*ACA was passed 60-39, supermajority.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unlike you, I won't accept that it's okay to do nothing because something is challenging.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who said I accept nothing? Simply because I lay out what needs to happen, while you live in la la land of "president just needs to want it". Why am I bothering with your nonsense replies, you need to do some reading. Ciao.