Linux

48331 readers

574 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

776

Linux back at 4.04% on the Desktop. Windows went below 73% (gs.statcounter.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Magnolia_@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml

211 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It peaked at 4.05% in March. The last 2 months it went just below 4% as the Unknown category increased. For June the reverse happened, so 4.04% seems to be the real current share of Linux on Desktop as desktop clients were read properly/werent spoofed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tisktisk@monero.town 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Question: Why is BSD so low? (And why/what is unknown?)

[–] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 9 points 4 months ago

The BSDs got screwed over by a lawsuit in the 90s that made a lot of people hesitant to use them (coincidentally leading to the creation of the Linux kernel). Inertia carried it from there and Linux ended up getting more hardware and software support, which is the primary reason that people pick Linux over the BSDs now.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Because it’s not overly popular as a desktop os, you are far more likely to see it in certain appliances and server applications etc, none of which will show up in a pagevisits based statistic.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 6 points 4 months ago

Less hardware support than Linux without enough substantially better about it to make it anyone's clear preference. Which isn't to say it doesn't have advantages over Linux. Just that the average BSD user is going to be able to easily swallow their pride and run Linux if things went wrong with a BSD install (trust me, I've literally done this, these people do exist)

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

There really isn't a compelling argument for BSD other than interest and hobby. It doesn't have the industrial use case Linux has.