this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
111 points (95.9% liked)

Cyberpunk 2077

4125 readers
1 users here now

Everything Cyberpunk 2077

Rules

  1. Be cool. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia etc.

  2. Mark spoilers and NSFW

Friends

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Kovu@lemmy.world
111
Cyberpunk 2077 | Patch 2.13 (www.cyberpunk.net)
submitted 1 month ago by Kovu@lemmy.world to c/cyberpunk2077@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Patch 2.13 for Cyberpunk 2077 and Phantom Liberty is being rolled out! It includes support for AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 with Frame Generation. Please note that this update is PC-only!

Keep in mind that despite the version mismatch between PC and console, Cross Progression will still function properly.

For details, check out the list of changes below.

  • Added support for AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 with Frame Generation.
  • More information can be found in this article on the Support website.
  • Added support for Intel Xe Super Sampling 1.3.
  • It will now be possible to enable both DLAA and DLSS Ray Reconstruction at the same time.
  • Added a new "Utilities" tab in Settings and moved HDD Mode, Hybrid CPU Utilization and AMD Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) options there.
  • Other stability and visual fixes.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh? For those of us that paid $90 for a broken game...

Aaaand there it is. Don't preorder games if you don't want to gamble your money.

[–] RickyWars@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GOG's refund policy is good enough that preordered games can get refunded anyways if they are poor. The ability to preload was worth preordering considering the practically zero downside with GOG. I could have refunded after playing but my computer was powerful enough to push through and still have the performance not be too poor except in a select few areas.

But regardless of the preorder situation, suggesting that this is things done right and we complain too much because there were 4 years of updates improving the state still is a strange stance to take. A game shouldn't be released in a state that it needs 4 years of updates for most users.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay fair enough, sorry, I think my last reply was in bad faith. The launch was a disaster and they should have pushed back. But at this point in it's lifecycle how much more can you squeeze out of this game if they aren't adding any more story DLC?