That said, an awareness of how our words and experiences may resonate with differing perspectives shows consideration and helps create a more inclusive space.

What do you think about helping us create the kind of platform we all want to be on?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It’s true that as a lemmy.ml admin, I’m not going out of my way to make this an inclusive space for traditional family values. I have different priorities for whom I make this space inclusive.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Inclusive for me but not for thee

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Rarely see it spelled out that clearly, I think that's a huge issue with modern "progressivism".

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Progressivism has no inherent need to be all-encompassing. In fact, keeping certain groups *cough conservatives cough* not included is an essential part of successful progressivism.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

You're referring to the tolerance paradox, and I completely agree with that, but I don't think that's what happened here.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Who knew how many reactionaries would get flushed out of the bushes by a little off-hand comment about my personal life?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

a lemmy.ml admin

Oh, this all makes sense now.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

So implying that name by marriage still implies ownership, excludes me, a man that wants to fly the banner of his wife's clan.

You aren't supporting your "different priorities" very well.