this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
176 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2566 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vladimir Putin has said that a western move to let Kyiv use longer-range weapons against targets inside Russia would mean Nato would be “at war” with Moscow.

Putin spoke as US and UK top diplomats discussed easing rules on firing western weapons into Russia, which Kyiv has been pressing for, more than two and a half years into Moscow’s offensive.

“This would in a significant way change the very nature of the conflict,” Putin told a state television reporter.

“It would mean that Nato countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,” he added. “If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.”

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't know what counts as a "world war" these days anymore.

A significant portion of the world's militaries have been involved in various Middle Eastern conflicts, yet those haven't been called world wars...

So... What qualifies as a world war?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think there's an agreed upon definition, but something akin to simultaneous engagements at different locations across the globe (different continents?) all as part of one interconnecting war maybe?

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a pretty good definition. But with this definition we aren't there yet.

The current wars aren't interconnected.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

True, it would depend entirely on what India and China do in a scenario in which NATO and Russia come to open War.