this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5663 readers
14 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Post an opinion and see if anyone can change it.

Let's give this a try!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The American system may not be terrible from a sporting perspective, but the politics is awful. Top-flight teams can be run poorly for years with basically no consequences, and if your team is uncompetitive then the fans just have to deal with that until your team fixes itself. In a pyramid system, your team at least drops to a tier where it will be competitive again.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well, I did it again. I clicked the "show in context" icon on Alexendrite instead of the identical one to add a link and nuked my comment. :-)

Summing it up:

  1. Those poorly managed franchises occupy a cultural space in North America not unlike "sleeping giant" clubs in Europe, and the financial and other parity measures are designed to encourage fans to hope every year. Sometimes it even works.
  2. The systems are different, largely arising out of differences between America in 1885 and England in 1885, but both have more than a century of passionate fan support and I find both compelling.
  3. MLS is a weird hybrid, being both the perfection of the closed shop model, yet also participating in the global market for both aging stars and younger players of decent but fungible quality.