this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
125 points (95.0% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2636 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Kyiv wants to hit Russia with U.S. long-range missiles
  • Biden comments suggest U.S. may be shifting its stance
  • Kremlin suspects U.S. will give Kyiv green light
  • Says direct Western involvement in war is growing
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GenosseFlosse 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At this point I'm questioning if they really have working nukes, or if some commanders sold them of to ISIS 15 Years go and the warheads are now filled with empty vodka bottles.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

More realistically warheads need their fissionable components replaced every 20 years or so, Considering Russia claims to field the worlds largest nuclear arsenal on the same budget the UK spends on a much smaller arsenal (albeit likely far more advanced in the delivery system department) its extremely questionable wether the nuclear material in most of those warheads is still viable.

While in a full scale nuclear war even a 10% success rate is apocalyptic it really does matter if they want to make a demonstration strike on Ukraine, imagine the geo-political ramifications of Russia making the huge decision to make a nuclear strike only for that missile to fail to properly detonate.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If putin throws a dud nuclear weapon out, would that stop us from nuking them? Would we be like "oh bless your heart," and stick to traditional weapons, or would we be like "you fucked around, now find out why America doesn't have universal health care?"

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 5 points 2 months ago

If putin throws a dud nuclear weapon out, would that stop us from nuking them?

No. Because retaliatory missiles would be fired long before the "dud" landed. I can guarantee that any missile leaving any known nuclear site would illicit a response. The only hesitation would be "where is it heading?". After that though... it's fair game.

now find out why America doesn’t have universal health care?”

Fucking wish America would stop being the worlds police.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I suspect turning another country into a radioactive wasteland of black-brown glass is politically unetnnable for most nations.