this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
193 points (99.0% liked)
Ukraine
8205 readers
710 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One concern I have is that, as I understand things, the HAWKs are primarily used as a counter to the Shahed drones. That's not to say that they don't have uses other than that. But my understanding is that that's a big part of where they went.
The MIM-23 missiles that it uses are an old missile, have not been produced for a long time. The Shahed drones are new production. There are large MIM-23 stockpiles, so they can hold off Shaheds for a while. But absent restarting production, they can't do it forever.
Either the stockpile needs to be able to last until Russia quits with the Shaheds, or there has to be a transition over to some kind of newer counter to the Shahed at some point.
goes to look for numbers
https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/alabugas-greatly-expanded-production-rate-of-shahed-136-drones/
This is projecting maybe 6,000 Shaheds produced at Russia's Alabuga facility by August 2025.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-23_Hawk
We've never fired the HAWK in war ourselves, and I've read that relatively-few have been used. So in an optimal scenario that said missiles haven't been scrapped, all countries holding them are willing to provide MIM-23 missiles, that missiles haven't decayed, that multiple launches are not done against individual targets to improve kill chances, and that no MIM-23s have been destroyed on the ground, at present production rates, total historical MIM-23 production would be able to last something like eight years of Shahed strikes. But my guess is that those are probably optimistic assumptions.
I also don't know whether Russia may have access to sources of Shahed drones other than from Alabuga, like new Iranian-made drones.
Great compilation and info. Thanks!
Solid rocket motors (which power these missiles in flight) have a limited shelf life. I couldn't find numbers specifically on the MIM-23 shelf life, but other solid rocket motors range from 10 to 50 years. With the age of the HAWK systems, its entirely possible that these missiles are close to or beyond their "Best use by" date where you wouldn't trust them as primary air defense. So using them against Shahed is a fine choice. You're essentially using throwaway munitions of your own against throwaway munitions of your adversary.
Possibly expired HAWK missiles against Shahed is a much better choice than Patriot against Shahed.
Sure, I'm not saying that it's a bad option of the available options. I'm just saying that if it's out of production and Shaheds are not, that means that it can only be used as a counter for a bounded period of time.
This is already the transition, from nothing to something.