this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1613 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

5412 readers
3243 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

either way with regard to more than half of those laws.

And the other half?

Oh, someone opposing gun control with poor rhetoric and "I don't believe in your science it's not actually science you can't actually say that for sure something will happen".

There's plenty of evidence. You just choose to ignore it.

How does it feel to be against something that works literally everywhere where it's been implemented on a national level, with the excuse of "well I don't care for the dying children, I'm not convinced by these hundreds of studies all saying the same thing, it's not enough evidence"?

Honestly, it's sickening. It'd be different if there weren't children constantly dying of gun violence in the states. But with all your school shootings and you still parrot this shit? It's disgusting.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you'd read what I wrote you'd see I agreed with a lot of the laws that worked, minus New Zealand's you dense prick.

I will not be replying further.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh... and pray tell which ones of the didn't?

You're conflating have objectively little evidence for a policy having had a large effect to that policy being the reverse of itself.

You went "hahahaha thanks for the laughs with that 'science' and pretended you've read the thing and that it doesn't show that gun control works, when ofc it fucking does.

Weird how you don't have any of that science you promised, eh? Almost as if I've had this same exact "debate" hundreds of times and knew what was gonna happen. So weird. Right...?