Vegan Circlejerk

247 readers

1 users here now

we absolutely respect veganism and what it stands for but

Unjerk: !vegan@lemmy.vg

Yum: !veganfood@lemmy.vg

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

nume@lemmy.vg

veganpizza69@lemmy.vg

november@lemmy.vg

361

Repost inspired by a true story. (vegantheoryclub.org)

submitted 2 months ago by NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org to c/vegancirclejerk@lemmy.vg

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Words matter, mindset matters blah blah dont have the time for a "your hairsplitting vs. my careful differentiation" debate rn

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Claiming ownership of an animal that doesn’t (and is unable to) consent overrules careful differentiation of words and mindsets.

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right which is why I said "less harmful than shelters" it's harm reduction not harmless

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What if the animal is born in your property and never tries to leave because it wants to stay?

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What then? Im not sure what your trying to say here. Animal on my property are my pets? Genuinely don't know what your hypothetical is meant to address?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Likely I misintepretted your post. I think I was saying its harmless in some cases not just harm reduction, but its not much point to make. Sorry!

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

No harm done 😄