this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
939 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it'd be more for obfuscation than completely hiding it. As long as there are other hidden networks on the ship you just name it something generic that blends in. I mean this whole thing is a really stupid idea, but naming it something like "COM.NAB_ISO:4133" would draw less attention.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It’s absolutely mind-boggling that the existing WiFi infrastructure on the military ship didn’t trigger any alarms. This is the kind of thing that you can get from “pro-sumer” grade hardware/software like Ubiquiti, let alone corporate-grade or military-grade stuff. The feature is called “Rogue Access Point Detection” and it’s built into literally every WiFi solution on the market. Like, your local library is analyzing this stuff it’s that basic.

Edit: To more directly address your point, the name shouldn’t matter at all. Rogue AP detection doesn’t give a shit about the display names of things, it looks at the actual hardware addresses and compares them to known things that are owned by your network.

[–] antimongo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yup, I did some on-campus IT work while I was in college and it was super trivial to detect when people would have their own networks in the dorms

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] jmf@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At mine it was not. Hotspots and the like that stayed up for too long were flagged and action was taken to have them disabled and the student reprimanded.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Well, I can understand that APs wouldn't be allowed since having lots of APs in one space makes it worse for everyone.

Wired should be allowed though.