this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

2187 readers
35 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ericjmorey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because the battery tech you're thinking about isn't the most efficient in all cases. Using hydrocarbons as a battery can be more efficient depending on circumstances.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a fairly extraordinary claim, do you have any sources on hydrocarbon creation being more efficient for round trip electrical storage than batteries?

[–] ericjmorey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Terraform is making the claim right now. By eliminating inverters and loss from long distance transmission lines there are opportunities to make solar installation that's not near existing infrastructure to be economically more viable.

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which circumstances?

Using electricity to create fuels purely for storage is a dead concept AFAIK. eFuels in the medium term will likely only be used where batteries cannot in their current form, e.g. aircraft or shipping. The energy and money cost needed to synthesise on-site with current tech is too high.

[–] ericjmorey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aircraft and shipping would be two very important circumstances.

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But that is not "using hydrocarbons as a battery" as your comment mentioned.

[–] ericjmorey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How is it not? Energy storage for use later in a different location from where it was collected seems like the purpose of a battery to me.