this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
719 points (84.7% liked)

Comics

5782 readers
221 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "devolve into a shitshow?

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

See every communist nation in history

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I see China building renewable energy capacity, and crazy fast trains, faster than the rest of the world combined.

I see Cuba, a tiny island nation, still independent after 64 years of brutal US sanctions.

I see Vietnam, a popular retirement destination for American 'expats'.

I see Russia, being fairly shitty and also 100% capitalist for 25 years.

Hmm, seems like you may have been told a bunch of times that communism is bad but never really looked into it.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see China starting to prosper as soon as they dropped the Communist economic model and opened up to capitalism, private ownership and free trade. I see Vietnam starting to do the same.

I see NK, a more developed nation than SK right after the war, very close to their communist allies and having the second biggest economy as trade partner and neighbor (USSR first, China now) now being irrelevant economically while you can't even enter or exit the country freely. In the meanwhile SK managed to become a global power. Btw, what's up with communist countries and not letting anyone enter or exit the country freely?

I see Vietnam, a popular retirement destination for American 'expats'.

Pretty sure this has nothing to do with communism. Happens also in Indonesia or Thailand and has all to do with them being poor as fuck and the huge human trafficking business happening in those countries. And those "expats" are the worst of the worst scum on earth, trust me

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The USA and the international institutions they control have done an impressive job making it look like open markets equals prosperity, but when you look just under the surface, a different picture emerges.

Vietnam, for example, was denied access to IMF loans, while trying to rebuild after an absolutely brutal war that basically set them back to the stone age. Only once they agreed to certain liberal reforms were they allowed access to the funds and resources they needed.

If you're not really paying attention, it looks like you're right.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

China is extremely capitalist lmao

I'm not fucking defending capitalism or demonizing communism, it's just never worked. I see absolutely zero reason to expect any difference if we tried it in the us

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Nuh-uh, Xi pressed the big red communism button and now all the capitalism is gone!

[is joke, obviously that's not how it works]

"It's just never worked" is ignorant though. Every nation that has tried to dump capitalism has has successes and failures, and there are many factors that contribute to each. Economies are extremely complex and you simply can't say anything intelligent without getting at least a bit more in-depth than "works/doesn't work".

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

China is Socialist with Chinese Characteristics, the CPC practices large and extensive levels of State Planning and the People's Democracy structure means the Capitalists in China do not control nor guide the State.

Capitalism exists in China as a concession, it isn't some fully Socialized state, but it is a transitional economy.

Read China Has Billionaires.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've looked, I see the exact opposite. Go back to reddit where you can wallow in ignorance without anybody noticing.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So large increases in literacy rates, life expectancy, home ownership, education access, healthcare access, and democratization of society is "devolving into a shitshow?"

Do you think Russians were better off under the thumb of the Tsar? Do you think Cubans were happier as slaves in Batista's US-backed slave-state? What point are you genuinely trying to make?

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

First part is a result of industrialization.

Second part, no they weren't, but that just means that they were worse off before, not that they were great afterwards.

I genuinely think the idea of communism is great, but human nature will ensure that it will never be successful. There will always be someone who gets greedy and takes more for themselves in the pursuit of wealth and power.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

human nature will ensure that it will never be successful

Human nature is to be kind and helpful. Humans are social creatures. We wouldn't have survived for thousands of years if everyone said "fuck you got mine".

Even if that were true, you are saying we should continue with the system that rewards stuff like greed, rather than try to have a system that doesn't. "Human nature" is an argument for socialism/communism.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

First part is a result of industrialization.

Partially, the other huge part is that the products of production were funneled into safety nets and state projects like railways and universities, providing free education and healthcare, and not corporate profits.

I genuinely think the idea of communism is great, but human nature will ensure that it will never be successful. There will always be someone who gets greedy and takes more for themselves in the pursuit of wealth and power.

What's considered "Human Nature" changes alongside Mode of Production. It isn't Human Nature to be greedy, greed is more often expressed within Capitalism.

Additionally, wealth disparity went way down in the USSR. It wasn't a case where some few individuals profited massively and others lived in squalor, wealth disparity skyrocketed after it collapsed.

Are you familiar with Marxist Theory? You have a decidedly Idealist take, rather than Materialist.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What you’re talking about here are results of industrialization. The same can be said for capitalist countries during the Industrial Revolution.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Not really, given that USSR managed to achieve the levels of industrialization that took a century under capitalism in mere decades while tangibly improving the lives of the working majority as opposed to exploiting the workers for the benefit of a small capital owning minority.

Today, we only need to look at the difference in development between China and India. Both started roughly in the same place in 1950s, with China taking the communist route and India taking capitalist one.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They were not. The USSR had free healthcare, education, incredibly cheap housing, all while it was far less developed than Western Countries. Development helped, yes, but what helped the most was Proletarian control and direction, not Bourgeois.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All while draining its member states of their wealth and human capital…

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

If that was true then we'd have very different result here