this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
678 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

10322 readers
2360 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 105 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

This is why workers forced movies and shows to put everyone in the closing credits.

Y'all need to unionize.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 47 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

From what I can tell, et al. is not about socio-political power*. It's just a necessity for ease and efficiency. In-text citations need to be short to limit wasted space. Otherwise, we'd have lots of text dedicated to unnecessary names. An in-text citation that reads (Perez et al., 2023) is much more efficient than (Perez, Washington, Smith, Iwukuni, Johnson, Patel, Boofy, Yamirez, Tate, Hendrix, Apple, Man, & Gargamel, 2023).

Using 7th ed. APA, the citation entries in the bibliography/references include upto the first 20 authors, so contributors are rarely omitted.

  • Perhaps being the first author is in many situations, but APA format can't really address that.
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

It's not like these are written on literal paper. It's the 21st century, There's no reason to save space in digital documents when you can just format them differently.

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I imagine they could have some sort of click to expand functionality

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

~~Literally even a spot bumped out on the end where they list everyone, at the very end of the paper, would be infinitely better than "et Al"~~

Uhhhhhh

Yeah I have no defense for this other than having a dumb moment.

Carry on... ^please^

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

That's what bibliography is. It's already like that, or am I missing something?

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It sounds like you're talking about the references, which already list all authors

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Then what's the issue? Sounds to me like papers already have comprehensive credits.

Is the issue that it's displayed in two places, so people don't bother to check out the second?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)