Linux

48364 readers

373 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

379

Linus Torvalds Begins Expressing Regrets Merging Bcachefs (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 3 months ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There's been some Friday night kernel drama on the Linux kernel mailing list... Linus Torvalds has expressed regrets for merging the Bcachefs file-system and an ensuing back-and-forth between the file-system maintainer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not under a license which prohibits also licensing under the GPL. i.e. it has no conditions beyond what the GPL specifies.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not true

The only condition is that CCDL and GPL don't apply to the same file. Wifi works just fine and the source code isn't GPL yet wifi drivers are in the kernel..

https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/2094/are-cddl-and-gpl-really-incompatible

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

...because they are incompatible licenses.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

There's no requirement for them to apply to the same file? There's already blobs in the kernel the gpl doesn't apply to the source of

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The question was "How do you define GPL compatible?". The answer to that question has nothing to do with code being split between files. Two licenses are incompatible if they can't both apply at the same time to the same thing.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

The two works can live harmoniously together in the same repo, therefore, not incompatible by one definition and the one that matters.

There's already big organisations doing it and they haven't had any issues