this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
-16 points (19.2% liked)

Fuck AI

1147 readers
650 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This study was shared on ley a few weeks ago, with a less clickbait title:

https://sopuli.xyz/post/15564020

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem, of course, is that there is no agreed-upon definition of what "Intelligence" even is. This seems to me to be a critical failure of people wanting to make an artificial version of it. "We've made Artificial Geflugenschurz!" "What's Geflugenschurz?" "That's not important. What's important is that we've made the artificial version of it!"

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There are many determinants of what's not intelligence though. For example a computer program that just processes data is generally not considered intelligent, no matter how much data it can process.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure how that's relevant.

There's many determinants of what isn't a piece of steel. Trying to make, however, a piece of steel by enumerating each item that isn't a piece of steel is not going to be productive. Generally you have to know what steel is and how it's made to make one.

We don't know what an intelligence is. We thus don't know how to make one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)